Seeking True Faith

  DMT in the Qur’an The Qur’an correctly describes the experience of death, also mentioning DMT. … DMT was researched extensively in the 20th Century, the Quran’s knowledge of it in the 7th Century, proves it is authored by a deity no less than  God. … DMT (dimethyltryptamine) is the most power hallucinogenic substance known to man. It’s endogenous (naturally produced in the body), and is suggested to be mass synthesized by the body during death. According to Timmermann et al., a significant amount of user reports on the experience of DMT include feelings of entering a different realm, encountering mystical beings, and “ego death” (feeling detached from the self and the material world). . What does this have to do with the Quran?  Well, there’s a peculiar verse in Surah Qaf about dying: Note the word intoxication. Islamically, this refers to mind-alteration, and the most notable effect of DMT is its extreme mind-alteration. If DMT is truly released in the body at death, i...

  The Qur’an tells of an “Expanding Universe” The above is what the Qur’an says, and the Qur’an was revealed in the seventh century. … Science discovered it in the 20th Century, a lot of time later 👇 Responding to Critiques of this Verse But it says “Heaven” not “Universe” 2. لَمُوسِعُونَ means it is vast, so you’re wrong ;) Nope, a simple google search will tell you it means to expand: 3. Other times this word (لَمُوسِعُونَ) has been used, it meant something different Nope, Only once. 4. The tafsirs don’t say this 5. B-but different translations?

  Thomas Aquinas' “First Cause” argument: (P1) In the physical world, we find that physical things come in series. (P2) A series of physical things cannot regress infinitely. (P3) Therefore, there must have been a first, immaterial, necessarily existing cause (from 1 & 2). (C) So, God exists (from 3) .. “Nomological Argument” by Prof. Hildebrand: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nous.12364 According to the Nomological Argument, observed regularities in nature are best explained by an appeal to a supernatural being. A successful explanation must avoid two perils. Some explanations provide too little structure, predicting a universe without regularities. Others provide too much structure, thereby precluding an explanation of certain types of lawlike regularities featured in modern scientific theories. We argue that an explanation based in the creative, intentional action of a supernatural being avoids these two perils whereas leading competitors do not.